Drawing for PASCUAL BIO FRUTAS

USPTO serial 75566954

PASCUAL BIO FRUTAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PASCUAL BIO FRUTAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N. ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029milk products, namely, fruit flavored fermented milkACTIVENov 27, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 30, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 30, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 24, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance