USPTO serial 75567053
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Zapopan Jalisco, Codigo 45070, MX
Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
Zapopan Jalisco, Codigo 45070, MX
Other trademarks owned by Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. De C.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books featuring information regarding tequila, the manufacturing of tequila, the history of tequila, and recipes for beverages containing tequila; art prints, decalcomania, writing pads and boards, paper signs, pens, pencils, pencil sharpeners | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Tote bags, billfolds, wallets, briefcases, key cases, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware, cocktail shakers, portable coolers, thermal insulated bottles and containers for food and drink | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, polo shirts, jackets, caps, hats, ties, scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Ornamental novelty pins and buttons | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |