USPTO serial 75567246
SERVICEHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2001
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SERVICEHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ten-4 Global Internet Solutions, LLC
Cupertino, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ten-4 Global Internet Solutions, LLC
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
CUPERTINO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily A. Danchuk, Esq.
Emily A. Danchuk, Esq. Danchuk Law, LLC2 Victoria LaneFalmouth, ME 04105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in providing an online dispatch service by linking a personal computer with wireless telephones | ACTIVE | May 13, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ten-4 Global Internet Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICEHUB CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TEN-4 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICEHUB CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICEHUB, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICEHUB, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SERVICEHUB CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SERVICEHUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 23, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 24, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |