USPTO serial 75567412
IT FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2100 Copenhagen 0, DK
2100 Copenhagen 0, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO AUTOMATE DATA WAREHOUSING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRAINING, INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIVE SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS CONCERNING COMPUTER SOFTWARE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE RENTAL; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES; LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A COMPUTER DATABASE CONSISTING OF AN ADMINISTRATION ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTS AND BUSINESS INFORMATION SUCH AS SALES, PRODUCTS, CUSTOMERS, COMPANY AND EMPLOYEE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IT FACTORY A/S
- Other trademarks owned by IT FACTORY A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IT FACTORY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |