USPTO serial 75567510
ORACOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORACOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Andover, MA
North Andover, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02451-1914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER NETWORK SERVERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE ADAPTED FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING; COMPUTER TELEPHONY HARDWARE; COMPUTER TELEPHONY SOFTWARE; AND COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |