Drawing for ONSITE SUPPORT

USPTO serial 75567549

ONSITE SUPPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ONSITE SUPPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE MENNENGA

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC CO3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06431-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN MOTOR CONTROLS AND PROCESS CONTROLLERSACTIVEJun 1, 1998
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE OF INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS AND THEIR NETWORKSACTIVEJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 28, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 15, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance