CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AROTECH

USPTO serial 75567740

AROTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AROTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wen-Ching Lin

WEN-CHING LIN LAW OFFICE WEN-CHING LIN99 N FIRST STSTE 200SAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001epoxy acrylate, polyester acrylate, acrylic acrylate, and urethane acrylate resins, which are cured by radiation, ultraviolet or electron bean, and are used in the manufacture of printing inks, overprint varnishes or adhesives, and in the manufacture of coatings used on metal, paper, plastic, wood, silk screens, and for off-set printing; epoxy acrylate oligomer, a novolac cresol epoxy acrylate resin, for use as liquid solder resistance in alkali development ink, and used in the manufacture of resins for personal computer boards; chemicals, namely, photo initiator benzophenone, which are used to initiate the photopolymerization of chemically unsaturated preparations, and are used in the manufacture of sunscreen formulations and polymers that prevent discoloration in petroleum waxes and similar materials; benzophenone used as photosensitizes in ultraviolet curing of printing inks, coatings on wood, plastics, metal, ceramic, and paperACTIVE—
017synthetic emulsion/water-based synthetic resin in the form of sheets for coating, printing, and lamination on various surfaces, or in the forms of bars, blocks, pellets, rods, and tubes for general industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance