USPTO serial 75568082
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kesler, Pass & Associates, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
Kesler, Pass & Associates, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
Kesler, Pass & Associates, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Reichertz
PETER S REICHERTZ ESQ SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1300 I ST NW 11TH FL EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing venture capital to others for financial business venture; managing venture capital funds; venture capital fund investment consultation; and venture capital investment; investment services, namely, investment consultation, investment advice, and investment management | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |