Drawing for MEDICAL DEVICE WEEK

USPTO serial 75568576

MEDICAL DEVICE WEEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDICAL DEVICE WEEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Harris

MICHAEL S HARRIS THE THOMSON CORPORATIONONE STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed publications, namely, newsletter providing information on the medical device industryACTIVEOct 22, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 28, 2000IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 14, 2000IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Oct 18, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance