USPTO serial 75568803
ION X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ION X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C REGEHR PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMERONE UTAH CTR201 S MAIN ST STE 1800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS IN TABLET, CAPSULE, POWDER, LIQUID OR READY TO EAT FOOD BAR FORM; DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DRINK MIXES | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |