USPTO serial 75568829
HIGH LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ciudad de Mexico, Distrito Federal, MX
Ciudad de Mexico, Distrito Federal, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D Fishman
MICHELLE L VISSER RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | ANIMAL SKINS; BRIEF CASES; ATTACHE CASES; SATCHELS; BILLFOLDS; WALLETS; COIN PURSES CREDIT CARD CARRIERS; KEY CASES; LEATHER CASES FOR COSMETICS AND TOILETRIES SOLD EMPTY; HANDBAGS; PURSES; DRAWSTRING POUCHES; LUGGAGE, NAMELY, TRUNKS; SUIT CASES; VALISES; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; TRAVEL BAGS; BACK PACKS; PARASOLS AND UMBRELLAS AND THEIR COVERS; AND CANES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORES SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING; SHOES; LEATHER GOODS; FINE AND COSTUME JEWELRY; PERFUMERY; AND HOUSEHOLD LINENS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |