USPTO serial 75569328
CHOCOLATE THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3071289Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOCOLATE THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey E. Gorrin
Bergman, Carole Lee147 Manhattan AvenueNew York, NY 10025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food products, namely, ice cream and chocolate candy | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |