USPTO serial 75569489
THE UNSINKABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE UNSINKABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pompano Beach, FL
Pompano Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Oltman
JOHN H OLTMAN OLTMAN, FLYNN & KUBLER915 MIDDLE RIVER DR STE 415FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304-3585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Casinos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |