USPTO serial 75569581
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Blythewood, SC
Other trademarks owned by POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
BLYTHEWOOD, SC
COLUMBIA, SC
WILMINGTON, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Heller
William J. Heller McCarter & English, LLP100 Mulberry StreetFour Gateway CenterNewark, NJ 07102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES TO ANALYZE WORKER'S COMPENSATION CLAIMS AND BODILY INJURY CLAIMS AND PROVIDE PLANS FOR SETTLEMENT AND RETURN TO WORK FOR INJURED WORKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |