Drawing for CHRYSTALIZED HAIR BALM

USPTO serial 75569607

CHRYSTALIZED HAIR BALM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRYSTALIZED HAIR BALM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. ST. LANDAU

CHRISTA COLE3RD FL12777 W JEFFERSON BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90066

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousses, hair sprays, styling preparations, pomades, moisturizers, and hair care preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance