USPTO serial 75569612
LA VIEJA CUBANA HECHO A MANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA VIEJA CUBANA HECHO A MANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
11-Andorra La Vella, AD
11-Andorra La Vella, AD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
J ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | TOBACCO GROWN FROM CUBAN SEEDS; CIGARS AND CIGARETTES MADE FROM TOBACCO GROWN FROM CUBAN SEEDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |