USPTO serial 75569974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CANTON, OH
CANTON, OH
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL M CISLO
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vitamin supplements, mineral supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 26, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |