Drawing for HOTSEND

USPTO serial 75570093

HOTSEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTSEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL PALLIZI, ESQ.

MICHAEL PALLIZI ESQ MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK & STONE150 W JEFFERSONSTE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in facilitating electronic communications, namely transmission of documents, text and images via emailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance