USPTO serial 75570218
THE ORIGINAL BEANIE HUNTING OUTFITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL BEANIE HUNTING OUTFITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard S. Reiter
HOWARD S REITER HOSMER & REITER158 PROSPECT HILLNEW MILFORD, CT 06776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY ADVERTISING MATERIALS, CATALOGS, STATIONARY, BUMPER STICKERS, GREETING CARDS, INVITATIONS, POSTERS, FLYERS, HUNTING CERTIFICATES, WALL CALENDARS, DESK CALENDARS, BROCHURES, COLORING BOOKS, CHILDREN'S BOOKS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS AND LICENSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, INFANTWEAR, CLOTH BIBS, INFANT CLOTH DIAPERS, PLAY SUITS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, T-SHIRTS, MOCK T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, POLO SHIRTS, HENLEYS,OXFORDS, TURTLENECKS, MOCK TURTLENECKS, CHAMBRAYS, HALTER TOPS, TOPS, VESTS, SWEATERS, SKIRTS, JUMPERS, JUMPSUITS, ROMPERS, COVERALLS,OVERALLS, JACKETS, SPORT JACKETS, BLAZERS, FLEECES, BOXER SHORTS, PANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, LEGGINGS, BOTTOMS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SUITS,JOGGING SUITS, WARM-UP SUITS, SUITS, OUTERWEAR, COATS, RAIN COATS, SNOW SUITS, SNOW PANTS, SOCKS, TIGHTS, BOOTIES, LEOTARDS, BODY SUITS, UNITARDS, GLOVES, MITTENS, HATS, BASEBALL CAPS, BELTS, APRONS, SWIMWEAR, BEACHWEAR, BEACH COVERUPS, HEAD BANDS, WRIST BANDS, SWEAT BANDS, SUSPENDERS, PRINTED SHOELACES, BATHROBES, UNDERWEAR, SLEEPWEAR, SCARVES, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES, MASQUERADE COSTUMES, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, TOTE BAGS, ATHLETIC BAGS,FANNY PACKS AND BACK PACKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |