USPTO serial 75570251
THE HOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert W. Hilburger
ALBERT W HILBURGER PERMAN & GREEN425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06430UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEO MEDIA IN THE NATURE OF DVD'S AND VIDEO CASSETTES IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL FITNESS AND PHYSICAL THERAPY | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIALS FOR A PHYSICAL FITNESS OR PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM, NAMELY, INSTRUCTION MANUALS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, FLASH CARDS, CHARTS, POSTERS, AND CALENDARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |