USPTO serial 75570267
EASY BREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY BREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William K. Baxter
WILLIAM K BAXTER ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLPSTE 1100100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | MALT EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING; MALT EXTRACTS FOR FOOD; MALT FOR FOOD PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING; DRIED HOPS; UNPROCESSED GRAINS FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING; HOME BREWING KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF MALT WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING, NAMELY, MALT EXTRACTS, MALT SYRUP, UNPROCESSED HOPS AND OTHER UNPROCESSED GRAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | MALT WORT; MALT SYRUP FOR BEVERAGES; HOME BREWING KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF MALT SYRUP WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING, NAMELY, MALT, MALT EXTRACTS, UNPROCESSED HOPS AND OTHER UNPROCESSED GRAINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northwestern Extract Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Northwestern Extract Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EASY BREW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |