Drawing for FIELDS OF FLOWERS

USPTO serial 75570405

FIELDS OF FLOWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIELDS OF FLOWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George J. Netter

GEORGE J NETTER260 S LOS ROBLES AVESTE 216PASADENA, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely shampoo, hair conditioner, moisturizer, foot care, after bath sprays, body oilACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 29, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance