Drawing for MIGHTY-LITE DOCKS

USPTO serial 75570583

MIGHTY-LITE DOCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MIGHTY-LITE DOCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W RYAN

THOMAS W RYAN PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Floating aluminum docks and gangwaysACTIVEMar 27, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 11, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 8, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 22, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance