USPTO serial 75570687
VIDEOLOGGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2000
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIDEOLOGGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET M. POWERS
MARGARET M POWERS GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INDEXING AND SEARCHING ON-LINE BROADCAST AND CABLE TELEVISION CLIPS, STREAMING VIDEO CLIPS AVAILABLE OVER THE GLOBAL INFORMATION COMPUTER NETWORK, MOVIE CLIPS, INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, HOME, MONITORING SURVEILLANCE, DISTANCE LEARNING AND ANIMATED VIDEO CLIPS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS AND USERS' MANUALS PACKAGED TOGETHER AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |