USPTO serial 75570716
DIRECTCHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRECTCHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WAYNE A SIVERTSON
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI ROONEY & SIVERTSON PABROADWAY PL E STE 4013433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing home shopping services featuring general merchandise by television, mail order catalog services featuring general merchandise and on-line shopping services featuring general merchandise via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |