USPTO serial 75570917
PLIANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLIANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH B. ULUER
DEBORAH B ULUER CHOATE, HALL & STEWARTEXCHANGE PL53 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | WOVEN GOODS, NAMELY, FURNITURE FABRICS, UPHOLSTERY FABRICS FOR TAPESTRY AND KNITTED GOODS FOR FURNITURE, RUBBER THREAD FOR TEXTILE USE AND PLASTIC MATERIAL THREADS FOR TEXTILE USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE WALL COVERINGS AND UPHOLSTERY FABRICS FOR FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |