USPTO serial 75571005
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
ROCHELLE PARK, NJ
ROCHELLE PARK, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amberly A. Martin
IP Administrator Redcats USA2300 Southeastern AvenueAttn: Legal DepartmentIndianapolis, IN 46201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |