USPTO serial 75571038
ADAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kassim M. Ferris
CODY BENKELMAN BENKELMAN ENGINEERING17 WILLOWBROOK CLOSEWHITEFISH, MT 59937UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY CAMERAS, CAMERA LENSES, GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM RECEIVERS, GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM ANTENNAS, AND AIRCRAFT MOUNTING HARDWARE THEREFOR; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT TO STORE, PROCESS AND DISPLAY DIGITAL IMAGE DATA, AND FOR FLIGHT PLANNING, IN-FLIGHT TARGETING FEEDBACK, AND POST-CAPTURE IMAGE PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR DISPLAYING, MANAGING AND MANIPULATING IMAGES; AND PRINTED USERS MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Aug 13, 1991 |
| 040 | COMPUTER PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, DIGITIZING AND MOSAICKING OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS, AND RECTIFICATION, MANIPULATION, AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL IMAGE DATA, ALL FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES | ACTIVE | Aug 13, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |