USPTO serial 75571215
TONING BODY TONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2000
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TONING BODY TONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darcy Pertcheck
DARCY PERTCHECK DHC USA INCORPORATED115 SANSOME ST STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [Make-up products namely - Eye Shadow, Blush, Liquid Foundation, Lipstick, Nail Polish, Mascara, Eyebrow Pencils and ]Facial Cleansing Products, namely, Soap, Facial Toners and Moisturizing Lotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |