USPTO serial 75571430
NETCARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETCARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERRY H. FLAX
SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; electronic transmission of messages and data | ACTIVE | May 25, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |