USPTO serial 75571588
SE RI PAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SE RI PAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bart Bisella
BART BISELLA NIXON, HARGRAVE, DEVANS & DOYLE LLP437 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction services for others in the field of golf courses, golf course facilities, tennis club facilities, country club facilities and athletic club facilities, and consultation in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | golf course design, golf course facility design, tennis club facility design, country club facility design and athletic club facility design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SE RI PAK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SE RI PAK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SE RI PAK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |