USPTO serial 75571950
VIP LIBRARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIP LIBRARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CSELT - CENTRO STUDI E LABORATORT TELECONUNICAZIONI S.p.A.
Via G. Reiss Romoli, 274, IT
Other trademarks owned by CSELT - CENTRO STUDI E LABORATORT TELECONUNICAZIONI S.p.A.
MILANO, IT
MILANO, IT
TELECOM ITALIA LAB S.P.A. IN SHORT TILAB S.P.A.
TURIN (TO), IT
Other trademarks owned by TELECOM ITALIA LAB S.P.A. IN SHORT TILAB S.P.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVENUEBOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; MODULES OF INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LIBRARIES, NAMELY, PROGRAM UNITS DESCRIBING FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST BE INCORPORATED IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT; SOFTWARE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH MODULES OF INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LIBRARIES FOR ESTABLISHING FUNCTIONS OF PARTS OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, FOR ESTABLISHING SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TECHNIQUE FOR PRODUCING THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR GENERATING A SPECIFIC PROGRAM CAPABLE OF MAPPING THE SOLUTION ONTO A SUBSTRATE AND GRAPHICS SOFTWARE FOR EFFECTING THE LAYOUT OF THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSELT - CENTRO STUDI E LABORATORT TELECONUNICAZIONI S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TELECOM ITALIA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TELECOM ITALIA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TELECOM ITALIA LAB S.P.A. IN SHORT TILAB S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIP LIBRARY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |