Drawing for ORIGINAL HOT ROD GRILL

USPTO serial 75572042

ORIGINAL HOT ROD GRILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIGINAL HOT ROD GRILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIT M STETINA

KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKERSTE 25075 ENTERPRISEALISO VIEJO, CA 92656

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 3, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 7, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance