Drawing for ELECTROGENESYS

USPTO serial 75572150

ELECTROGENESYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTROGENESYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHANNON T VALE

SHANNON T VALE FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701-2978UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Carbon based electrodes; parts and fittings therefor, namely, membranes, frame electrode assemblies, membrane electrode assemblies and electrolyte manifoldsACTIVE—
011Turn-key energy storage plant operations sold and operated as single units to store electricity, electrochemical processing plants; electrochemical reactors; and parts and fittings therefor, namely, electrochemical reactor frames to support reactor elements, and electrochemical reactor frames to seal electrolyte manifoldsACTIVE—
035Operation of a business for others, namely, electrical processing plants, electrochemical cells, and electric energy storage plants for others and consultation thereforACTIVE—
037Installation, repair and maintenance services for electrochemical cells, electric energy storage plants and electrochemical processing plantsACTIVE—
042Consultation services relating to installation, repair and maintenance of electrochemical cells, electrical energy storage plants and electrochemical processing plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 200144EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Feb 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance