USPTO serial 75572251
INSURE LINC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSURE LINC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs
MICHAEL D HOBBS TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP NATIONSBANK PLZ600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Risk Management Program for Telecommunications Products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Communications Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Communications Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INSURE LINC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |