Drawing for OFFICEFUSION

USPTO serial 75572317

OFFICEFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OFFICEFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E LAWRENCE HARASYM III

MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs to enable integration of software programs, operating systems and databases that will allow users or an organization's workgorups to create, share, manage and store in a repository, internal or web-based documents with full check-in, check-out, editing/version control and hierarchical security access capabilitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 27, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance