USPTO serial 75572444
SCHWARZKOPF RE-NATURANCE CREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHWARZKOPF RE-NATURANCE CREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christel Emerson
CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL CORPORATIONTHE TRIAD, STE 2002200 RENAISSANCE BLVDGULPH MILLS, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SCHWARZKOPF RE-NATURANCE CREME
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |