Drawing for THE LEADER WITHIN

USPTO serial 75572457

THE LEADER WITHIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LEADER WITHIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN H LOWENSTEIN

JOAN H LOWENSTEIN SEELIGSON JORDAN & DELOOF301 E LIBERTY STE 250ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs used for self-testing, consulting, assessment and motivational trainingACTIVESep 1, 1998
016Books, printed manuals, stationery, instructional materials, brochures and printed materials relating to business consulting and motivational trainingACTIVESep 1, 1998
035Business and management consulting services, management researchACTIVESep 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 9, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 6, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 16, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 1, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance