USPTO serial 75572484
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH ANN MORGAN
ELIZABETH ANN MORGAN POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP191 PEACHTREE ST NE FL 16ATLANTA, GA 30303-1740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | INDICATE MEMBERSHIP IN AN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY BANKS | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |