Drawing for ULTRASMARTS

USPTO serial 75572759

ULTRASMARTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRASMARTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey G. Sheldon

JEFFREY G SHELDON SHELDON & MAK225 S LAKE AVE9TH FLPASADENA, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Food products, namely, sauces, spices, cookies, biscuits, wafers, chocolate bars, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, cereal-based snack foods, flour, ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; candy and chewing gum; beverages, namely, coffee, tea, and herbal tea for food purposesACTIVE—
032Beverages, namely, vegetable juice, fruit juice, combination vegetable and fruit juices, juices containing herbs, and non-alcoholic, fermented vegetable and fruit juices; bottled water, bottled mineral waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 18, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance