Drawing for CRAZY RAZBERRY CRUSH

USPTO serial 75572805

CRAZY RAZBERRY CRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAZY RAZBERRY CRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD G HARRER, ESQ

RICHARD G HARRER ESQ THE DIAL CORP15501 N DIAL BLVD STE 2214SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260-1615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Scented candlesACTIVE—
005Air freshenerACTIVE—
010Non electric massage apparatusACTIVE—
021Exfoliating skin care products, namely, exfoliating mitts, exfoliating bath sponges, facial sponges, or gloves for cleansing; nylon body puff or sponge used for mild skin cleansing and skin conditioning benefits; and candles holders not of precious metalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 1, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance