Drawing for SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY

USPTO serial 75572841

SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEE THINGS DIFFERENTLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Management of building facilities for businesses, health care providers and educational institutions; cost containment services in the health care field, namely, administering group purchasing plans and contracts relating to food products, capital equipment, pharmaceutical products, medical supplies and non-medical products and services used in medical facilities or institutional dining; consulting services in the field of management of health care facilities; vending machine services; operating concession stands featuring foods and beveragesACTIVE—
037Housekeeping services, namely, cleaning of buildings, laundry services for clothing, sheets, towels, hospital gowns and uniforms; custodial services and janitorial services; plant operation and maintenance services, namely, maintenance and repair of food service equipment and of heating, air-conditioning, ventilation, lighting, electrical, gas, fuel oil, water and mechanical systems and equipment in connection thereinACTIVE—
042Preparing and serving food in institutional dining facilities; grounds keeping services; providing quality control for health care providers; hospital patient and hospital bed tracking services, namely, monitoring the status of hospital patients and beds for the purpose of minimizing the time during which beds are left empty; consulting services in the field of institutional dining facilties; child care services; kitchen and restaurant design services for others; security guard servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 15, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 1, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance