Drawing for UV-MX+

USPTO serial 75573097

UV-MX+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with UV-MX+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Gilson

CHRISTOPHER L WANGER MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD BLDG 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002coatings for ophthalmic lenses, anti-reflective coatings for ophthalmic lenses, abrasion resistant coatings for ophthalmic lenses; impact resistant coatings for ophthalmic lenses; anti-fog coatings for ophthalmic lensesACTIVE—
009optical goods and apparatus, namely, spectacles, sunglasses, safety goggles, contact lenses, spectacle lenses, lens blanks and ophthalmic lenses of all types not including intraocular lensesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 28, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 15, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance