USPTO serial 75573132
TEDDIREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEDDIREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Bernstein
JASON A BERNSTEIN BERNSTEIN & ASSOCIATES PC6600 PEACHTREE DUNWOODY RD NEEMBASSY ROW 400 STE 495ATLANTA, GA 30328-1649Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | BEDDING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BACK REST PILLOWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |