Drawing for SERAFINA FABULOUS PIZZA

USPTO serial 75573202

SERAFINA FABULOUS PIZZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERAFINA FABULOUS PIZZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine S. Kim

CHRISTINE S KIM RABINOWITZ, BOUDIN, STANDARDKRINSKY & LIEBERMAN, PC740 BROADWAY FIFTH FLNEW YORK, NY 10003-9518

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 10, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance