USPTO serial 75573253
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Other trademarks owned by Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Other trademarks owned by Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
Pine Bluff, AR
Other trademarks owned by Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc.
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
PINE BLUFF, AR
Other trademarks owned by STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cary M. Pumphrey, Senior Attorney, Intellectual Property
Cary M. Pumphrey, Senior Attorney, Intellectual Pr Walgreen Co.104 Wilmot RoadMS1425 - Second FloorDeerfield, IL 60015| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail drug stores; retail store services in the fields of health and beauty aids, paper products, greeting cards, food, school supplies and household goods; retail pharmacy services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |