Drawing for CLASS OF THE MILLENNIUM

USPTO serial 75573274

CLASS OF THE MILLENNIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASS OF THE MILLENNIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold J. Fassnacht

HAROLD J FASSNACHT BULLWINKEL PARTNERS, LTD19 S LASALLE ST STE 1300CHICAGO, IL 60603-1493UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Feb 29, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance