USPTO serial 75573347
RIGTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCGEE, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIGTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aberdeen AB11 6LB, GB
Aberdeen AB11 6LB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMS ET ALP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | VIBRATORY SCREENING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, SCREENS, SIEVES, RESERVOIRS, CLUMP WEIGHTS, ELECTRIC AND HYDRAULIC MOTORS, BEARINGS AND GEARBOXES FOR FLUID HANDLING, PROCESSING OR STORAGE; CHEMICAL MIXERS; HYDROCYCLONE MACHINES FOR THE SEPARATION OF SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS; MACHINES AND MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY NOZZLES, JETS, PIPES, BEARINGS, ELECTRIC AND HYDRAULIC MOTORS, GEARBOXES, AND TRANSFER PUMPS, ALL FOR SPRAYING, CLEANING, CENTRIFUGING OR DECANTING | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; DATA PROCESSORS FORMING PART OF MACHINES FOR MONITORING AND/OR CONTROLLING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO MONITOR AND/OR CONTROL THE OPERATION OF MACHINES FOR OIL WELL DRILLING, PUMPING, RECOVERING OIL, DRILLING FLUIDS, PROCESSING SUCH FLUIDS, AND SEPARATION OF SOLIDS FROM SUCH FIELDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT IDENTIFIED ABOVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE OF VIBRATORY SIFTING AND SIEVING MACHINES AND SCREENS FOR USE WITH VIBRATORY SIFTING AND SIEVING MACHINES, DATA PROCESSORS, AND COMPUTERS RELATED THERETO IN THE OIL INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH FOR USE IN PROBLEM-SOLVING ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH VIBRATORY SIFTING AND SIEVING MACHINES AND SCREENS FOR USE ON VIBRATORY SIFTING AND SIEVING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rig Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Rig Technology Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RIGTECH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |