Drawing for VIDEO IQ

USPTO serial 75573404

VIDEO IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM O.FERRON

WILLIAM O FERRON SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GRP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video recorders and players; blank computer tapes, computer discs and smart cards for storing graphic, video, multimedia and computer networks and global communication networks content; a full line of computers, computer peripherals, and electronic devices; general use computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; general use computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration, transmission, storage, display and editing of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; digital video and still cameras and camcorders; television sets; set-top boxes for televisionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 7, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 30, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 2, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance