USPTO serial 75573555
LASERSHARP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2000
- Examiner
- MEDLOCK,LAUREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LASERSHARP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
White Bear Lake, MN
White Bear Lake, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Olsen
Michael T. Olsen Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetSuite 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | laser machine tools used to cut, etch, abrade, puncture, or perforate various materials | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 4, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 1, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |